ArticleCritical care medicine2012
Acute respiratory distress syndrome after trauma: development and validation of a predictive model.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral fat embolism after traumatic bone fractures: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of ulinastatin and budesonide combination therapy in pelvic fracture complicated by pulmonary contusion.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
- Lung complications are common in intensive care treated patients with pelvis fractures: a retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016Trial
- Development and validation of a prediction model for respiratory complications and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- NLRP3 inflammasomes at the ARDS-cancer interface: mechanisms and translational hypotheses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Machine learning for predicting acute lung injury after trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- A conformational change of C-reactive protein drives neutrophil extracellular trap formation in inflammation.BMC biology · 2025Article
- A Simple Nomogram for Predicting the Development of ARDS in Postoperative Patients with Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Hypoalbuminemia: incidence and its impact on acute respiratory distress syndrome and 28-day outcome in trauma patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Observational
- Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: Use of an Artificial Neural Network Model.Emergency medicine international · 2023Article
- Clustering of trauma patients based on longitudinal data and the application of machine learning to predict recovery.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Combat Trauma-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Scoping Review.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
- Predictors of mortality in trauma patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Surgery in practice and science · 2022Article
- Enhancing Diagnosis Through Technology: Decision Support, Artificial Intelligence, and Beyond.Critical care clinics · 2022Review
- The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in acute lung injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Living on Borrowed Breath: Respiratory Distress, Social Breathing, and the Vital Movement of Ventilators.Medical anthropology quarterly · 2021Article
- Article
- Risk Factors Analysis of Thoracic Trauma Complicated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Observation of Curative Effect of Lung-Protective Ventilation.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine early clinical predictors of acute respiratory distress syndrome after major traumatic injury and characterize the performance of this acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction model, and two previously published acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction models, in an independent cohort of severely injured patients.
designProspective cohort study.
settingUniversity-affiliated level I trauma center in Seattle, WA, and nine hospitals participating in the Inflammation and Host Response to Injury Consortium. PATIENTS: Model derivation utilized data from 224 patients participating in a randomized controlled trial. All models were validated in an independent cohort of 1,762 trauma patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsVariables strongly associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in bivariate analysis (p<.01) were entered into a multiple logistic regression equation to generate an acute respiratory distress syndrome predictive model. We evaluated the performance of all models using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in 79 subjects (35%) belonging to the development cohort and in 423 subjects (24%) from the validation cohort. Multivariable predictors of acute respiratory distress syndrome after trauma included subject age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score, injury severity score, and the presence of blunt traumatic injury, pulmonary contusion, massive transfusion, and flail chest injury (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.79 [95% confidence interval 0.73, 0.85]). Validation of the prediction model resulted in an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.74). Our model's performance in the validation cohort was superior to that of two other published acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction models (0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.63, 0.68] and 0.66 [95% confidence interval 0.64, 0.69], p<.01 for all comparisons).
conclusionsUsing routinely available clinical data, our prediction model identifies patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome early after severe traumatic injury. This predictive model could facilitate enrollment of subjects into future clinical trials designed to prevent this serious complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.