ArticleBiomedical engineering online2012
Iterative integral parameter identification of a respiratory mechanics model.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exhalation-synchronous robotic abdominal compression for user-centered respiratory assistance and training in neurological patients.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Thoracoabdominal asynchrony in a virtual preterm infant: computational modeling and analysis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023Article
- Reconstructing asynchrony for mechanical ventilation using a hysteresis loop virtual patient model.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
- Stochastic integrated model-based protocol for volume-controlled ventilation setting.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
- Stochastic Modelling of Respiratory System Elastance for Mechanically Ventilated Respiratory Failure Patients.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Observational
- Use of the DISST model to estimate the HOMA and Matsuda indexes using only a basal insulin assay.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-specific respiratory mechanics models can support the evaluation of optimal lung protective ventilator settings during ventilation therapy. Clinical application requires that the individual's model parameter values must be identified with information available at the bedside. Multiple linear regression or gradient-based parameter identification methods are highly sensitive to noise and initial parameter estimates. Thus, they are difficult to apply at the bedside to support therapeutic decisions.
methodsAn iterative integral parameter identification method is applied to a second order respiratory mechanics model. The method is compared to the commonly used regression methods and error-mapping approaches using simulated and clinical data. The clinical potential of the method was evaluated on data from 13 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients.
resultsThe iterative integral method converged to error minima 350 times faster than the Simplex Search Method using simulation data sets and 50 times faster using clinical data sets. Established regression methods reported erroneous results due to sensitivity to noise. In contrast, the iterative integral method was effective independent of initial parameter estimations, and converged successfully in each case tested.
conclusionThese investigations reveal that the iterative integral method is beneficial with respect to computing time, operator independence and robustness, and thus applicable at the bedside for this clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.