ArticleBMC public health2012
Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intention among Indigenous Western Australians.
Article in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Influence of Asian Subgroup and Acculturation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge and Attitudes Among Chinese and Korean Americans.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Barriers and facilitators to the utilization of cancer screening services in two Arctic Indigenous communities in Canada.Global health action · 2026Article
- A Review of Western Australian Researchers' Contributions to Understanding Cancer Prevention and Outcomes in Aboriginal People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward screening of colorectal cancer among adults in Kuwait primary health care centers.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Using Facebook to Improve Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Gastric Cancer Literacy and Related Factors in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Cervical screening attendance in young women and people with a cervix: An application of the COM-B model.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- University Departments of Rural Health and cancer research in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Health-promoting lifestyle among Chinese patients with colorectal polyps: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Colorectal cancer screening participation in First Nations populations worldwide: a systematic review and data synthesis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer literacy and related factors in northeast of Iran: A cross-sectional study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- "A Huge Gap": Health Care Provider Perspectives on Cancer Screening for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in the Northern Territory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes toward Colorectal Cancer among Healthcare Workers: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Survey in Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Assessment of Psychosocial Correlates and Associated Factors of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Southwestern Saudi Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Predictors of cancer screening behavior of the working population in China based on the information-motivation-behavioral skills model.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Recognition and participation of colorectal cancer screening in Turkiye: A systematic review and meta-analysis study.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2023Review
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare workers on early gastrointestinal cancer in China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Experience and Attitude of Colorectal Screening Pilot Program Participants Regarding Screening and Screening Programs in Hungary.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndigenous Australians are significantly less likely to participate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening compared to non-Indigenous people. This study aimed to identify important factors influencing the decision to undertake screening using Faecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT) among Indigenous Australians. Very little evidence exists to guide interventions and programmatic approaches for facilitating screening uptake in this population in order to reduce the disparity in colorectal cancer outcomes.
methodsInterviewer-administered surveys were carried out with a convenience sample (n = 93) of Indigenous Western Australians between November 2009-March 2010 to assess knowledge, awareness, attitudes and behavioural intent in regard to CRC and CRC screening.
resultsAwareness and knowledge of CRC and screening were low, although both were significantly associated with exposure to media advertising (p = 0.008; p < 0.0001). Nearly two-thirds (63%; 58/92) of respondents reported intending to participate in screening, while a greater proportion (84%; 77/92) said they would participate on a doctor's recommendation. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression demonstrated that independent predictors of screening intention were, greater perceived self-efficacy (OR = 19.8, 95% CI = 5.5-71.8), a history of cancer screening participation (OR = 6.8, 95% CI = 2.0-23.3) and being aged 45 years or more (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 1.2-16.5). A higher CRC knowledge score (medium vs. low: OR = 9.9, 95% CI = 2.4-41.3; high vs. low: 13.6, 95% CI = 3.4-54.0) and being married or in a de-facto relationship (OR = 6.9, 95% CI = 2.1-22.5) were also identified as predictors of intention to screen with FOBT.
conclusionsImproving CRC related knowledge and confidence to carry out the FOBT self-screening test through education and greater promotion of screening has the potential to enhance Indigenous participation in CRC screening. These findings should guide the development of interventions to encourage screening uptake and reduce bowel cancer related deaths among Indigenous Australians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.