Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22809376›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2012

Drug interactions in dying patients: a retrospective analysis of hospice inpatients in Germany.

Sebastian Frechen, Anna Zoeller, Klaus Ruberg, Raymond Voltz, Jan Gaertner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polypharmacy, chemotherapy receipt, and medication-related out-of-pocket costs at end of life among commercially insured adults with advanced cancer.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Need for Deprescribing in Hospital Elderly Patients Discharged with a Limited Life Expectancy: The REPOSI Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Polypharmacy in the terminal stage of cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  11. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian FrechenDepartment of Palliative Care, Cologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany. sebastian.frechen@uk-koeln.de
Anna Zoeller
Klaus Ruberg
Raymond Voltz
Jan Gaertner
University Hospital Cologne · DEFederal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients at the end of life often receive numerous medications for symptom management. In contrast to all other clinical situations, the aim of pharmacotherapy is strictly focused on quality of life.

objectiveThe primary aims of this study were to assess the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in patients at the very end of life by identifying drug combinations and risk factors associated with a high risk of DDIs; and evaluate the clinical relevance of the potential DDIs in this unique patient population. Secondary objectives were to increase prescriber awareness and to derive a comprehensive framework for physicians to minimize DDIs in this specific setting of end-of-life care. MATERIALS AND

methodsCharts of 364 imminently dying inpatients of two hospices were reviewed retrospectively. Drugs prescribed during the last 2 weeks of life were screened for DDIs by the electronic database of the Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, which classifies DDIs by therapeutic measures required to reduce possible adverse events according to the ORCA system (OpeRational ClAssification of Drug Interactions).

resultsPotential DDIs were detected in 223 patients (61%). In a multivariate analysis, polypharmacy was the major predictor for DDIs (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.4, 1.6). The drugs most commonly involved in therapeutically relevant potential DDIs were antipsychotics, antiemetics (e.g. metoclopramide, antihistamines), antidepressants, insulin, glucocorticoids, cardiovascular drugs and, in particular, NSAIDs. The most prevalent potential adverse effects were pharmacodynamically additive anticholinergic, antidopaminergic, cardiac (QT interval prolongation) and NSAID-associated toxicity (e.g. gastrointestinal, renal).

conclusionIn the context of end-of-life care, the clinical relevance of DDIs differs from other clinical settings. Most DDIs can be prevented if the prescribing physician considers a few therapeutic principles. Specifically, this concerns the awareness of futile and high-risk medications, as well as rational alternatives.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHospice CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansInpatientsMalePolypharmacyRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22809376
OpenAlexW123275559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.