ArticleJournal of bioinformatics and computational biology2012
Beyond comparing means: the usefulness of analyzing interindividual variation in gene expression for identifying genes associated with cancer development.
Article in Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- SIEVEseq: unified differential expression, variability, and skewness analyses using RNA-Seq data.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026Article
- Improving data interpretability with new differential sample variance gene set tests.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma using transcriptome analysis.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- clrDV: a differential variability test for RNA-Seq data based on the skew-normal distribution.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Identification of differentially distributed gene expression and distinct sets of cancer-related genes identified by changes in mean and variability.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A lung cancer risk classifier comprising genome maintenance genes measured in normal bronchial epithelial cells.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Article
- Integration of copy number and transcriptomics provides risk stratification in prostate cancer: A discovery and validation cohort study.EBioMedicine · 2015Article
- How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics.BMC genomics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying genes associated with cancer development is typically accomplished by comparing mean expression values in normal and tumor tissues, which identifies differentially expressed (DE) genes. Interindividual variation (IV) in gene expression is indirectly included in DE gene identification because given the same absolute differences in means, genes with lower variance tend to have lower p-values. We explored the direct use of IV in gene expression to identify candidate genes associated with cancer development. We focused on prostate (PCa) and lung (LC) cancers and compared IV in the expression level of genes shown to be cancer related with that in all other genes in the human genome. Compared with all those other genes, cancer-related genes tended to have greater IV in normal tissues and a greater increase in IV during the transition from normal to tumorous tissue. Genes without significantly different mean expression values between tumor and normal tissues but with greater IV in tumor than in normal tissue (note: the DE-based approach completely ignores those genes) had stronger associations with clinically important features like Gleason score in PCa or tumor histology in LC than all other genes were. Our results suggest that analyzing IV in gene expression level is useful in identifying novel candidate genes associated with cancer development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.