Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22809140›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2012

Intraoperative stem cell therapy.

Mónica Beato Coelho, Joaquim M S Cabral, Jeffrey M Karp

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RegenerativeAesthetic plastic surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Regenerative Medicine Treatments for Androgenetic Alopecia.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Five Decades Later, Are Mesenchymal Stem Cells Still Relevant?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mónica Beato CoelhoCenter for Regenerative Therapeutics and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Joaquim M S Cabral
Jeffrey M Karp
University of Lisbon · PTHarvard Stem Cell Institute · US

Funding

Engineered Induction of a Stem Cell Homing ResponseR01HL095722 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KARP, JEFFREY MICHAEL · 2010 to 2018
$3.9M
Examining firm adhesion and transmigration of surface engineered MSCsR21HL097172 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KARP, JEFFREY MICHAEL · 2010 to 2011
$470k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL095722NHLBI NIH HHS HL097172NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells hold significant promise for regeneration of tissue defects and disease-modifying therapies. Although numerous promising stem cell approaches are advancing in clinical trials, intraoperative stem cell therapies offer more immediate hope by integrating an autologous cell source with a well-established surgical intervention in a single procedure. Herein, the major developments in intraoperative stem cell approaches, from in vivo models to clinical studies, are reviewed, and the potential regenerative mechanisms and the roles of different cell populations in the regeneration process are discussed. Although intraoperative stem cell therapies have been shown to be safe and effective for several indications, there are still critical challenges to be tackled prior to adoption into the standard surgical armamentarium.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical EngineeringCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell LineageChondrogenesisHumansIntraoperative PeriodNeovascularization, PhysiologicRegenerationRegenerative MedicineStem CellsStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID22809140
PMCPMC3646373
OpenAlexW2148316991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.