Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22809132›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2014

Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska, Carole Mockford, Sandra Herron-Marx, John Hughes, Colin Tysall, Rashida Suleman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 814 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
814citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

814 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evaluating Process and Outcomes of Public Involvement in Applied Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. The soft-shell technique in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber - a randomized trial on the influence of the ophthalmic viscosurgical device.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Engaging With a Participatory Research Team: Evaluation of Involving Older Co-Researchers With Experience of Falls in the SeFallED Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  16. Evaluating the Process and Outcome of a Primary Care Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Programme: A Pilot Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  17. Bridging Lived and Expert Experience: A Qualitative Study Exploring Lived-Experience Experts' and Researchers' Experiences of Public Engagement in Cancer Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of Co-Production in Adolescent Health Research: A Mixed Methods Study From Born in Bradford.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

754 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jo BrettRoyal College of Nursing Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sophie Staniszewska
Carole Mockford
Sandra Herron-Marx
John Hughes
Colin Tysall
Rashida Suleman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement (PPI) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research.

objectiveTo identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research.

designA systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2009 and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Grey literature was assessed using the Dixon-Woods et al. (2005) checklist. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study. MAIN

resultsA total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user-focused research objectives, development of user-relevant research questions, development of user-friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer-focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified.

conclusionThis study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchPatient ParticipationSocial WelfareHealth Services ResearchHumanshealth and social care researchimpact on researchpatient and public involvementuser involvement

Identifiers

PMID22809132
PMCPMC5060910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.