Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22808195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Ageing increases vulnerability to aβ42 toxicity in Drosophila.

Iain Rogers, Fiona Kerr, Pedro Martinez, John Hardy, Simon Lovestone, Linda Partridge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Progressive behavioral and cognitive decline inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toxicity ofLife science alliance · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Toxicity Evaluation of the Subacute Diazinon in Aged Male Rats: Hematological Aspects.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Alzheimer's Disease and Sleep-Wake Disturbances: Amyloid, Astrocytes, and Animal Models.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Iain RogersInstitute of Healthy Ageing and GEE, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona Kerr
Pedro Martinez
John Hardy
Simon Lovestone
Linda Partridge
MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBMax Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701075Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age is the major risk factor for many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's Disease (AD), for reasons that are not clear. The association could indicate that the duration or degree of exposure to toxic proteins is important for pathology, or that age itself increases susceptibility to protein toxicity. Using an inducible Drosophila model of AD, we investigated these possibilities by varying the expression of an Aβ42 transgene in neurons at different adult ages and measuring the effects on Aβ42 levels and associated pathological phenotypes. Acute induction of Arctic Aβ42 in young adult flies resulted in rapid expression and clearance of mRNA and soluble Arctic Aβ42 protein, but in irreversible expression of insoluble Arctic Aβ42 peptide. Arctic Aβ42 peptide levels accumulated with longer durations of induction, and this led to a dose-dependent reduction in negative geotaxis and lifespan. For a standardised level of mRNA expression, older flies had higher levels of Arctic Aβ42 peptide and associated toxicity, and this correlated with an age-dependent reduction in proteasome activity. Equalising Aβ42 protein at different ages shortened lifespan in correlation with the duration of exposure to the peptide, suggesting that Aβ42 expression accumulates damage over time. However, the relative reduction in lifespan compared to controls was greater in flies first exposed to the peptide at older ages, suggesting that ageing itself also increases susceptibility to Aβ42 toxicity. Indeed older flies were more vulnerable to chronic Aβ42 toxicity even with a much lower lifetime exposure to the peptide. Finally, the persistence of insoluble Aβ42 in both young and old induced flies suggests that aggregated forms of the peptide cause toxicity in later life. Our results suggest that reduced protein turnover, increased duration of exposure and increased vulnerability to protein toxicity at later ages in combination could explain the late age-of-onset of neurodegenerative phenotypes.

Indexed as

AgingAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression RegulationMifepristonePeptide FragmentsRNA, MessengerSolubilityTime FactorsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)MifepristonePeptide FragmentsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22808195
PMCPMC3395685
OpenAlexW2037980416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.