ArticlePloS one2012
Profiling cellular protein complexes by proximity ligation with dual tag microarray readout.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomacromolecule-Assisted Screening for Reaction Discovery and Catalyst Optimization.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Mucosal bromodomain-containing protein 4 mediates aeroallergen-induced inflammation and remodeling.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2019Observational
- Novel selection methods for DNA-encoded chemical libraries.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2015Review
- Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines--a review.Analytica chimica acta · 2015Review
- Correction: Profiling cellular protein complexes by proximity ligation with dual tag microarray readout.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
- Heterogeneity in immune responses: from populations to single cells.Trends in immunology · 2014Review
- Identification of ligand-target pairs from combined libraries of small molecules and unpurified protein targets in cell lysates.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2014Article
- DNA sequencing methods in human genetics and disease research.F1000prime reports · 2013Review
- Solid-phase proximity ligation assays for individual or parallel protein analyses with readout via real-time PCR or sequencing.Nature protocols · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patterns of protein interactions provide important insights in basic biology, and their analysis plays an increasing role in drug development and diagnostics of disease. We have established a scalable technique to compare two biological samples for the levels of all pairwise interactions among a set of targeted protein molecules. The technique is a combination of the proximity ligation assay with readout via dual tag microarrays. In the proximity ligation assay protein identities are encoded as DNA sequences by attaching DNA oligonucleotides to antibodies directed against the proteins of interest. Upon binding by pairs of antibodies to proteins present in the same molecular complexes, ligation reactions give rise to reporter DNA molecules that contain the combined sequence information from the two DNA strands. The ligation reactions also serve to incorporate a sample barcode in the reporter molecules to allow for direct comparison between pairs of samples. The samples are evaluated using a dual tag microarray where information is decoded, revealing which pairs of tags that have become joined. As a proof-of-concept we demonstrate that this approach can be used to detect a set of five proteins and their pairwise interactions both in cellular lysates and in fixed tissue culture cells. This paper provides a general strategy to analyze the extent of any pairwise interactions in large sets of molecules by decoding reporter DNA strands that identify the interacting molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.