Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22808020›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

Oral antimicrobial rinse to reduce mycobacterial culture contamination among tuberculosis suspects in Uganda: a prospective study.

Nelson Kalema, Saskia Den Boon, Adithya Cattamanchi, J Lucian Davis, Alfred Andama, Winceslaus Katagira, Charles Everett, Nicholas Walter, Patrick Byanyima, Sylvia Kaswabuli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nelson KalemaMakerere University - University of California San Francisco Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. kalemanelson@gmail.com
Saskia Den Boon
Adithya Cattamanchi
J Lucian Davis
Alfred Andama
Winceslaus Katagira
Charles Everett
Nicholas Walter
Patrick Byanyima
Sylvia Kaswabuli
William Worodria
Laurence Huang
MUJHU Research Collaboration · UGUniversity of California, San Francisco · USMakerere University · UG

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
International HIV-associated Opportunistic Pneumonias (IHOP) StudyR01HL090335 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUANG, LAURENCE · 2007 to 2011
$4.0M
Patient-Oriented Research and Mentoring in PneumocystisK24HL087713 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUANG, LAURENCE · 2006 to 2018
$1.8M
Immunodiagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-infected PatientsK23HL094141 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CATTAMANCHI, ADITHYA · 2009 to 2013
$760k
Oral Wash for Nucleic Acid Diagnosis and Prognosis of TB in HIV-Infected UgandansK23AI080147 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DAVIS, JOHN LUCIAN · 2008 to 2012
$711k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL087713NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090335NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI080147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleContamination by bacterial or fungal organisms reduces the effectiveness of mycobacterial culture for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated the effect of an anti-microbial and an anti-fungal oral rinse prior to expectoration on culture-contamination rates.

methodsWe enrolled a consecutive random sample of adults with cough for ≥ 2 weeks and suspected TB admitted to Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) between October 2008 and June 2009. We randomly assigned patients to oral rinse (60 seconds with chlorhexidine followed by 60 seconds with nystatin) vs. no oral rinse prior to initial sputum collection. Uganda National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory technicians blinded to the method of sputum collection (with or without oral rinse) processed all sputum specimens for smear microscopy (direct Ziehl-Neelsen) and mycobacterial culture (Lowenstein-Jensen media).

resultsOf 220 patients enrolled, 177 (80%) were HIV-seropositive (median CD4-count 37 cells/uL, IQR 13-171 cells/uL). Baseline characteristics were similar between patients in the oral-rinse (N = 110) and no oral-rinse (N = 110) groups. The proportion of contaminated cultures was significantly lower in the oral-rinse group compared to the no oral-rinse group (4% vs. 15%, risk difference -11%, 95% CI -18 to -3%, p = 0.005). Oral rinse significantly reduced the proportion of contaminated cultures among HIV-infected patients (3% vs. 18%, risk difference -14%, 95% CI -23 to -6%, p = 0.002) but not HIV-uninfected (6% vs. 4%, risk difference 2%, 95% CI -12 to +15%, p = 0.81) patients. However, the proportion of smear-positive specimens (25% vs. 35%, p = 0.10) and culture-positive specimens (48% vs. 56%, p = 0.24) were lower in the oral-rinse compared to the no oral-rinse group, although the differences were not statistically significant.

conclusionsOral rinse prior to sputum expectoration is a promising strategy to reduce mycobacterial culture contamination in areas with high HIV prevalence, if strategies can be devised to reduce the adverse impact of oral rinse on smear- and culture-positivity.

Indexed as

HIVAdultAnti-Infective AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountChlorhexidineCoinfectionColony Count, MicrobialCoughFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMicroscopyMouthwashesMycobacterium tuberculosisNystatinAnti-Infective AgentsChlorhexidineMouthwashesNystatin

Identifiers

PMID22808020
PMCPMC3395623
OpenAlexW2060358901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.