ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2012
Different antigen presentation tendencies of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced bone marrow-derived macrophages and peritoneal macrophages.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- New mechanistic insights into macrophage extracellular trap formation induced by a parasitic nematode,Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Immunization with recombinant Salmonella expressing SspH2-EscI protects mice against wild type Salmonella infection.BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
- Bone marrow-derived and peritoneal macrophages have different inflammatory response to oxLDL and M1/M2 marker expression - implications for atherosclerosis research.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Responses of macrophages against Salmonella infection compared with phagocytosis.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-induced bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) and primary peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) are usually used for antigen presentation in in vitro experiments. In order to expound their tendency for uptake and antigen presentation, we compared differences in the degree of phagocytosis, the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, and the activation of T lymphocytes between these two cell types. These assays used the F4/80 marker expression, as it is the general marker for macrophages. The BMC population was found to contain both F4/80(bright) and F4/80(dim) subtypes, while PECs were mainly composed of the F4/80(bright) subtype. Expression levels of cell surface co-stimulatory molecules, CD80, CD86, CD54, and CD40, were significantly higher for F4/80(+)BMCs than F4/80(+)PECs. Their expressions were further upregulated for F4/80(+)BMCs than for F4/80(+)PECs after stimulation with flagellin. F4/80(+)BMCs had a weaker ability to phagocytize microbeads than F4/80(+)PECs (P < 0.05), and we determined no relationship between F4/80 expression and phagocytosis. T lymphocytes were activated more efficiently after incubation with BMCs pulsed with flagellin than with pulsed PECs. In this study, F4/80(+)BMCs and F4/80(+)PECs represent the bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) and peritoneal macrophages (PMs), respectively. These results indicate that PMs showed greater potential for phagocytosis, whereas GM-CSF-induced BMMs showed a tendency toward antigen presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.