Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22806916›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2012

Embryonic template-based generation and purification of pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for heart repair.

Pieterjan Dierickx, Pieter A Doevendans, Niels Geijsen, Linda W van Laake

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stem cells for cardiac repair: an introduction.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pieterjan DierickxDivision Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.dierickx@hubrecht.eu
Pieter A Doevendans
Niels Geijsen
Linda W van Laake
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death in Western countries. Many types of cardiovascular diseases are due to a loss of functional cardiomyocytes, which can result in irreversible cardiac failure. Since the adult human heart has limited regenerative potential, cardiac transplantation is still the only effective therapy to address this cardiomyocyte loss. However, drawbacks, such as immune rejection and insufficient donor availability, are limiting this last-resort solution. Recent developments in the stem cell biology field have improved the potential of cardiac regeneration. Improvements in reprogramming strategies of differentiated adult cells into induced pluripotent stem cells, together with increased efficiency of directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells toward cardiac myocytes, have brought cell-based heart muscle regeneration a few steps closer to the clinic. In this review, we outline the status of research on cardiac regeneration with a focus on directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells toward the cardiac lineage.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationMyocardial ContractionRegenerative MedicineAnimalsBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell SurvivalEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenotypeHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMorphogenesisMyocardial InfarctionBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID22806916
OpenAlexW1970708986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.