Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22806407›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2012

Imaging of cells and nanoparticles: implications for drug delivery to the brain.

Katica Stojanov, Inge S Zuhorn, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Erik F J de Vries

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Visualization of Nanocarriers and Drugs in Cells and Tissue.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Bionanotechnology and the future of glioma.Surgical neurology international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katica StojanovDepartment of Cell Biology / Membrane Cell Biology University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
Inge S Zuhorn
Rudi A J O Dierckx
Erik F J de Vries

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in the development of central nervous system drugs is to obtain therapeutic effective drug concentrations inside the brain. Many potentially effective drugs have never reached clinical application because of poor brain penetration. Currently, devices are being developed that may improve drug delivery into the brain. One approach involves the encapsulation of drugs into nanocarriers that are targeted to the brain, where the drug is released. Alternatively, living cells have been engineered to produce the pharmaceutical of interest at the target site. It is important to follow the fate of these drug delivery devices inside the body to verify their efficiency in reaching the brain. To this end, both ex-vivo approaches and in-vivo imaging techniques are used, including ex-vivo biodistribution, autoradiography, MRI, optical imaging, PET and SPECT. All these methods have their specific advantages and limitations. Consequently, selection of the tracking method should be based on the specific aims of the experiment. Here, we will discuss the methods that are currently applied for tracking brain drug delivery devices, including the most commonly used labels and labeling procedures for living cells and nanocarriers. Subsequently, we will discuss specific applications in tracking drug delivery devices.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsBrainContrast MediaDrug CarriersFluorescent DyesGenes, ReporterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNanoparticlesOptical ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadioisotopesStaining and LabelingTissue DistributionTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonContrast MediaDrug CarriersFluorescent DyesRadioisotopes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.