ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2012
Evaluation of the probiotics Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus plantarum bioencapsulated in Artemia nauplii against vibriosis in European sea bass larvae (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.).
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiome of Aquatic Organisms: Role in Immunity Formation and Effects on Aquaculture Productivity.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Microbial education plays a crucial role in harnessing the beneficial properties of microbiota for infectious disease protection in Crassostrea gigas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Administration of probiotics affectsFish and shellfish immunology reports · 2023Article
- Effects of dietary supplementation ofAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023Article
- Selective Antagonism of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici againstMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Current Status of Probiotics in European Sea Bass Aquaculture as One Important Mediterranean and Atlantic Commercial Species: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Simultaneous Quantification of Bisphenol-A and 4-Tert-Octylphenol in the Live Aquaculture FeedMethods and protocols · 2022Article
- The Efficacy ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Characterization and Quantitative Determination of a Diverse Group of Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis NCIB 3610 Antibacterial Peptides.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Isolation and characterization of a novel antimicrobial oxatetracyclo ketone from Bacillus stercoris MBTDCMFRI Ba37 isolated from the tropical estuarine habitats of Cochin.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- Benefits of a Bacillus probiotic to larval fish survival and transport stress resistance.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Administration of Probiotics Improves the Brine Shrimp Production and Prevents Detrimental Effects of Pathogenic Vibrio Species.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Evolution of probiotics in aquatic world: Potential effects, the current status in Egypt and recent prospectives.Journal of advanced research · 2015Review
- Isolation and characterisation of Bacillus spp. antagonistic to Vibrio parahaemolyticus for use as probiotics in aquaculture.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2015Article
- Probiotics in fish and shellfish culture: immunomodulatory and ecophysiological responses.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two potential probiotics Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus plantarum were evaluated for use in aquaculture as preventive measures against vibriosis. In vitro evaluation of the probiotics using co-culture assays with the pathogen Vibrio anguillarum and testing for the production of antibacterial substances showed the presence of antagonism and confirmed the production of antibacterial substances. Both potential probiotics were administered to the live fish feed Artemia franciscana nauplii, offering protection against a subsequent challenge of the nauplii with the fish pathogen V. anguillarum, with best survival rates of the nauplii and the most efficient protection offered by B. subtilis. Nauplii enriched with B. subtilis were further used to evaluate the protection of sea bass larvae against vibriosis. The untreated group of fish challenged with V. anguillarum presented low survival of 36.7 %, while the fish treated with nauplii enriched with the probiotic B. subtilis showed significantly increased survival rates of 86.7 % after challenge with the pathogen. The survival of healthy unchallenged fish treated with the probiotic was not significantly different from control unchallenged fish (90-94 %). Our results indicate that B. subtilis is a probiotic suitable to be used for the prevention of vibriosis in fish larvae and can be safely administered through their live feed Artemia nauplii.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22806117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.