Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22805709›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2012

De novo mutations in human genetic disease.

Joris A Veltman, Han G Brunner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 454 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
454citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
50.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

454 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 874 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. EstimatingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Haematologica · 2026
    Article
  16. Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

394 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joris A VeltmanDepartment of Human Genetics, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Institute for Genetic and Metabolic disease, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. j.veltman@gen.umcn.nl
Han G Brunner
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New mutations have long been known to cause genetic disease, but their true contribution to the disease burden can only now be determined using family-based whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing approaches. In this Review we discuss recent findings suggesting that de novo mutations play a prominent part in rare and common forms of neurodevelopmental diseases, including intellectual disability, autism and schizophrenia. De novo mutations provide a mechanism by which early-onset reproductively lethal diseases remain frequent in the population. These mutations, although individually rare, may capture a significant part of the heritability for complex genetic diseases that is not detectable by genome-wide association studies.

Indexed as

MutationAutistic DisorderFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenomeGerm CellsHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleSchizophreniaSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID22805709
OpenAlexW2146128933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.