Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22805708›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2012

Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data.

Ziv Bar-Joseph, Anthony Gitter, Itamar Simon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Existence of Causation without Correlation in Transcriptional Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptome analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nonlinear memory in cell-division dynamics across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recovering time-varying networks from single-cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziv Bar-JosephLane Center for Computational Biology and Machine Learning Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. zivbj@cs.cmu.edu
Anthony Gitter
Itamar Simon

Funding

Reconstructing dynamic regulatory networksR01GM085022 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BAR-JOSEPH, ZIV · 2008 to 2011
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM085022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological processes are often dynamic, thus researchers must monitor their activity at multiple time points. The most abundant source of information regarding such dynamic activity is time-series gene expression data. These data are used to identify the complete set of activated genes in a biological process, to infer their rates of change, their order and their causal effects and to model dynamic systems in the cell. In this Review we discuss the basic patterns that have been observed in time-series experiments, how these patterns are combined to form expression programs, and the computational analysis, visualization and integration of these data to infer models of dynamic biological systems.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingModels, GeneticAnimalsData Interpretation, StatisticalEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMiceSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID22805708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.