Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22805293›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2012

Structured management strategy based on the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Questionnaire (GerdQ) vs. usual primary care for GERD: pooled analysis of five cluster-randomised European studies.

J Ponce, V Garrigues, L Agréus, E Tabaglio, M Gschwantler, E Guallar, M Tafalla, J Nuevo, J Hatlebakk

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

J PonceDigestive Functional Disorders Unit, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain. jponceg@medynet.com
V Garrigues
L Agréus
E Tabaglio
M Gschwantler
E Guallar
M Tafalla
J Nuevo
J Hatlebakk
AstraZeneca (Spain) · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHaukeland University Hospital · NOJohns Hopkins University · USKarolinska Institutet · SESocietà Italiana di Medicina Generale · ITWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse to treatment among primary care patients with gastro-oesophageal disease (GERD) is variable.

aimThe GERD Management Project (GMP) evaluated the effectiveness of a structured management approach to GERD vs. standard treatment (usual care).

methodsData from five cluster-randomised clinical trials in adult primary care patients with symptoms of GERD were pooled. The structured pathway was based on the self-administered GERD Questionnaire (GerdQ) and was compared with standard treatment.

results1734 patients were enrolled (structured treatment, n=834; standard treatment, n=900). The difference in the mean GerdQ score change from baseline favoured the structured pathway (-0.61; 95% CI: -0.88, -0.34; p<0.001). The odds ratio for an indication for treatment revision at the end of follow-up (structured vs. standard treatment) was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.52; p=0.001).

conclusionsManagement of primary care patients with GERD can be improved by systematic stratification of patients using a patient management tool such as the GerdQ.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisCritical PathwaysFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22805293
PMCPMC3601421
OpenAlexW1838683919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.