Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Effects of atomoxetine on the QT interval in healthy CYP2D6 poor metabolizers.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Randomized Thorough QT Trial Using Concentration-QT Analysis to Evaluate the Effects of Centanafadine on Cardiac Repolarization.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2025Trial
- Endophenotypes of OSA that are responsive to pharmacological agents: a narrative review of trazodone and atomoxetine.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Review
- Personalizing atomoxetine dosing in children with ADHD: what can we learn from current supporting evidence.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Review
- Management of Orthostatic Hypotension in the Hospitalized Patient: A Narrative Review.The American journal of medicine · 2022Review
- The use of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medications in cardiac disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Pharmacologic management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a review for practitioners.Translational pediatrics · 2018Review
- Atomoxetine: A Review of Its Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics Relative to Drug Disposition.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2016Review
- Atomoxetine-induced life-threatening long QT syndrome.Irish journal of medical science · 2013Article
- Risk of serious cardiovascular problems with medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.CNS drugs · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe effects of atomoxetine (20 and 60 mg twice daily), 400 mg moxifloxacin and placebo on QT(c) in 131 healthy CYP2D6 poor metabolizer males were compared.
methodsAtomoxetine doses were selected to result in plasma concentrations that approximated expected plasma concentrations at both the maximum recommended dose and at a supratherapeutic dose in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. Ten second electrocardiograms were obtained for time-matched baseline on days -2 and -1, three time points after dosing on day 1 for moxifloxacin and five time points on day 7 for atomoxetine and placebo. Maximum mean placebo-subtracted change from baseline model-corrected QT (QT(c)M) on day 7 was the primary endpoint.
resultsQT(c)M differences for atomoxetine 20 and 60 mg twice daily were 0.5 ms (upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval 2.2 ms) and 4.2 ms (upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval 6.0 ms), respectively. As plasma concentration of atomoxetine increased, a statistically significant increase in QT(c) was observed. The moxifloxacin difference from placebo met the a priori definition of non-inferiority. Maximum mean placebo-subtracted change from baseline QT(c)M for moxifloxacin was 4.8 ms and this difference was statistically significant. Moxifloxacin plasma concentrations were below the concentrations expected from the literature. However, the slope of the plasma concentration-QT(c) change observed was consistent with the literature.
conclusionAtomoxetine was not associated with a clinically significant change in QT(c). However, a statistically significant increase in QT(c) was associated with increasing plasma concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.