Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22802968›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato.

Sung-Chur Sim, Gregor Durstewitz, Jörg Plieske, Ralf Wieseke, Martin W Ganal, Allen Van Deynze, John P Hamilton, C Robin Buell, Mathilde Causse, Saranga Wijeratne and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fine-mapping and candidate gene analysis of qFF3.1 conferring fruit firmness in a modern tomato variety.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of late blight resistance QTLsMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Article
  9. An advanced 10K SNP panel for genotyping tomato (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic tapestry of Capsicum fruit colors: a comparative analysis of four cultivated species.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Analysis of Romanian Lycium Genotypes: ExploringInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sung-Chur SimDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States of America.
Gregor Durstewitz
Jörg Plieske
Ralf Wieseke
Martin W Ganal
Allen Van Deynze
John P Hamilton
C Robin Buell
Mathilde Causse
Saranga Wijeratne
David M Francis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concurrent development of high-throughput genotyping platforms and next generation sequencing (NGS) has increased the number and density of genetic markers, the efficiency of constructing detailed linkage maps, and our ability to overlay recombination and physical maps of the genome. We developed an array for tomato with 8,784 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) mainly discovered based on NGS-derived transcriptome sequences. Of the SNPs, 7,720 (88%) passed manufacturing quality control and could be scored in tomato germplasm. The array was used to generate high-density linkage maps for three interspecific F(2) populations: EXPEN 2000 (Solanum lycopersicum LA0925 x S. pennellii LA0716, 79 individuals), EXPEN 2012 (S. lycopersicum Moneymaker x S. pennellii LA0716, 160 individuals), and EXPIM 2012 (S. lycopersicum Moneymaker x S. pimpinellifolium LA0121, 183 individuals). The EXPEN 2000-SNP and EXPEN 2012 maps consisted of 3,503 and 3,687 markers representing 1,076 and 1,229 unique map positions (genetic bins), respectively. The EXPEN 2000-SNP map had an average marker bin interval of 1.6 cM, while the EXPEN 2012 map had an average bin interval of 0.9 cM. The EXPIM 2012 map was constructed with 4,491 markers (1,358 bins) and an average bin interval of 0.8 cM. All three linkage maps revealed an uneven distribution of markers across the genome. The dense EXPEN 2012 and EXPIM 2012 maps showed high levels of colinearity across all 12 chromosomes, and also revealed evidence of small inversions between LA0716 and LA0121. Physical positions of 7,666 SNPs were identified relative to the tomato genome sequence. The genetic and physical positions were mostly consistent. Exceptions were observed for chromosomes 3, 10 and 12. Comparing genetic positions relative to physical positions revealed that genomic regions with high recombination rates were consistent with the known distribution of euchromatin across the 12 chromosomes, while very low recombination rates were observed in the heterochromatic regions.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosome MappingDNA, PlantGenetic LinkageGenome, PlantGenotypeSolanum lycopersicumDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22802968
PMCPMC3393668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.