Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22802964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Behavioural analyses of quinine processing in choice, feeding and learning of larval Drosophila.

Amira El-Keredy, Michael Schleyer, Christian König, Aslihan Ekim, Bertram Gerber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Anti-Mitochondrial and Insecticidal Effects of Artemisinin againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Insects · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. One-trial learning in larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Aversive and Appetitive Learning inJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Caffeine Taste Signaling in Drosophila Larvae.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amira El-KeredyGenetics and Neurobiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael Schleyer
Christian König
Aslihan Ekim
Bertram Gerber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gustatory stimuli can support both immediate reflexive behaviour, such as choice and feeding, and can drive internal reinforcement in associative learning. For larval Drosophila, we here provide a first systematic behavioural analysis of these functions with respect to quinine as a study case of a substance which humans report as "tasting bitter". We describe the dose-effect functions for these different kinds of behaviour and find that a half-maximal effect of quinine to suppress feeding needs substantially higher quinine concentrations (2.0 mM) than is the case for internal reinforcement (0.6 mM). Interestingly, in previous studies (Niewalda et al. 2008, Schipanski et al 2008) we had found the reverse for sodium chloride and fructose/sucrose, such that dose-effect functions for those tastants were shifted towards lower concentrations for feeding as compared to reinforcement, arguing that the differences in dose-effect function between these behaviours do not reflect artefacts of the types of assay used. The current results regarding quinine thus provide a starting point to investigate how the gustatory system is organized on the cellular and/or molecular level to result in different behavioural tuning curves towards a bitter tastant.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrosophilaLarvaQuinineReinforcement, PsychologySucroseTasteQuinineSucrose

Identifiers

PMID22802964
PMCPMC3393658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.