Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22802932›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Pairing of homologous regions in the mouse genome is associated with transcription but not imprinting status.

Christel Krueger, Michelle R King, Felix Krueger, Miguel R Branco, Cameron S Osborne, Kathy K Niakan, Michael J Higgins, Wolf Reik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
  9. Spatial proximity of homologous alleles and long noncoding RNAs regulate a switch in allelic gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Condensins and 3D Organization of the Interphase Nucleus.Current genetic medicine reports · 2013
    Article
  15. Robust 3D DNA FISH using directly labeled probes.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2013
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christel KruegerEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom. christel.krueger@babraham.ac.uk
Michelle R King
Felix Krueger
Miguel R Branco
Cameron S Osborne
Kathy K Niakan
Michael J Higgins
Wolf Reik
Babraham Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

EPIGENETIC REGULATION IN A CANCER ASSOCIATED REGIONR01CA089426 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI HIGGINS, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2002 to 2012
$2.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008071/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H088071/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/0000C214Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/0000S119Medical Research Council G0700760NCI NIH HHS 2R01 CA089426NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089426Wellcome Trust 095645Wellcome Trust 095645/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although somatic homologous pairing is common in Drosophila it is not generally observed in mammalian cells. However, a number of regions have recently been shown to come into close proximity with their homologous allele, and it has been proposed that pairing might be involved in the establishment or maintenance of monoallelic expression. Here, we investigate the pairing properties of various imprinted and non-imprinted regions in mouse tissues and ES cells. We find by allele-specific 4C-Seq and DNA FISH that the Kcnq1 imprinted region displays frequent pairing but that this is not dependent on monoallelic expression. We demonstrate that pairing involves larger chromosomal regions and that the two chromosome territories come close together. Frequent pairing is not associated with imprinted status or DNA repair, but is influenced by chromosomal location and transcription. We propose that homologous pairing is not exclusive to specialised regions or specific functional events, and speculate that it provides the cell with the opportunity of trans-allelic effects on gene regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsChromosomes, MammalianEmbryonic Stem CellsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelMiceKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelKcnq1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22802932
PMCPMC3389011
OpenAlexW2077065713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.