Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22802740›Full record

ReviewPLoS medicine2012

HIV treatment as prevention: the utility and limitations of ecological observation.

M Kumi Smith, Kimberly A Powers, Kathryn E Muessig, William C Miller, Myron S Cohen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High HIV-1 RNA Among Newly Diagnosed People in Botswana.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. HIV Prevention Efforts and Incidence of HIV in Uganda.The New England journal of medicine · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. HIV treatment as prevention in men who have sex with men: examining the evidence.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Kumi SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kimberly A Powers
Kathryn E Muessig
William C Miller
Myron S Cohen

Funding

Acute HIV infection - A key link for transmission preventionR01AI083059 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MILLER, WILLIAM C, PETTIFOR, AUDREY · 2009 to 2012
$3.7M
HIV IN SEMEN-EFFECTS OF STDS AND ANTIVIRAL THERAPYR37DK049381 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COHEN, MYRON SCOTT · 2005 to 2014
$3.4M
VIROLOGIC AND IMMUNOLOGIC EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRIMARY HIV INFECTIONZ01AI000700 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI COHEN, O J · 1994 to 1997
–
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083059NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI0700NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK049381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveEcological and Environmental PhenomenaHIV InfectionsHumansTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22802740
PMCPMC3393666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.