Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22802707›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2012

Expression pattern of drought stress marker genes in soybean roots under two water deficit systems.

Anna Cristina Neves-Borges, Fábia Guimarães-Dias, Fernanda Cruz, Rosilene Oliveira Mesquita, Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno, Eduardo Romano, Marcelo Ehlers Loureiro, Maria de Fátima Grossi-de-Sá, Márcio Alves-Ferreira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Aspartate Aminotransferase Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Overexpression of soybeanFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hydrogel-based transparent soils for root phenotyping in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Cristina Neves-BorgesDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fábia Guimarães-Dias
Fernanda Cruz
Rosilene Oliveira Mesquita
Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno
Eduardo Romano
Marcelo Ehlers Loureiro
Maria de Fátima Grossi-de-Sá
Márcio Alves-Ferreira
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of tolerance mechanisms for drought stress in soybean is fundamental to the understanding and development of tolerant varieties. Using in silico analysis, four marker genes involved in the classical ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways of drought response were identified in the Glycine max genome in the present work. The expression profiles of the marker genes ERD1-like, GmaxRD20A-like, GmaxRD22-like and GmaxRD29B-like were investigated by qPCR in root samples of drought sensitive and tolerant soybean cultivars (BR 16 and Embrapa 48, respectively), submitted to water deficit conditions in hydroponic and pot-based systems. Among the four putative soybean homologs to Arabidopsis genes investigated herein, only GmaxRD29B-like was not regulated by water deficit stress. Distinct expression profiles and different induction levels were observed among the genes, as well as between the two drought-inducing systems. Our results showed contrasting gene expression responses for the GmaxRD20A-like and GmaxRD22-like genes. GmaxRD20A-like was highly induced by continuous drought acclimating conditions, whereas GmaxRD22-like responses decreased after abrupt water deprivation. GmaxERD1-like showed a different expression profile for the cultivars in each system. Conversely, GmaxRD20A-like and GmaxRD22-like genes exhibited similar expression levels in tolerant plants in both systems.

Indexed as

drought adaptationGlycine maxmarker geneswater deficit

Identifiers

PMID22802707
PMCPMC3392874
OpenAlexW2141923344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.