ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012
Initial steps in the opening of a Shaker potassium channel.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual mechanisms contribute to enhanced voltage dependence of an electric fish potassium channel.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- NaBiophysical journal · 2021Review
- Article
- The Cole-Moore Effect: Still Unexplained?Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- K⁺ channel gating: C-type inactivation is enhanced by calcium or lanthanum outside.The Journal of general physiology · 2014Article
- X-ray crystal structure of voltage-gated proton channel.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2014Article
- External protons destabilize the activated voltage sensor in hERG channels.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2014Article
- Extracellular protons inhibit charge immobilization in the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Energetic role of the paddle motif in voltage gating of Shaker K(+) channels.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The structural model of a K(V) (K(+)-selective, voltage-gated) channel in the open state is known (Protein Data Bank ID code 2R9R). Each subunit of the channel has four negatively charged residues distributed in the transmembrane segments S1, S2, and S3 that bind to and facilitate the movement within the membrane of the positively charged, voltage-sensing residues of S4. When extrapolated to the closed state, the two outermost negatively charged residues are exposed to extracellular fluid and not bound to S4 residues, all of which have theoretically been driven inward by voltage. If this closed state model is correct, these residues are available to bind external cations. We examined the effects of La(3+) on voltage-gated Shaker K(+) channels. Addition of the trivalent cation La(3+) (50 μM) extracellularly markedly prolongs the lag that precedes channel opening and slows the subsequent rise of K(+) current (I(K)) at all voltages. Decay kinetics of I(K) at negative voltages are unaltered. Gating current (I(g)) recorded from a nonconducting mutant shows that La(3+) reduces the initial amplitude of I(g) nearly twofold. We postulate that, in the resting state, La(3+) binds to the unoccupied, outermost negative residues, hindering outward S4 motion, thus increasing the lag on activation and slowing the rise of I(K). In the activated state, La(3+) is displaced by outward movement of arginine residues in S4; La(3+), therefore, is not present to affect channel closing. The results give strong support to the closed state model of the K(V) channel and a clear explanation of the effect of multivalent cations on cellular excitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.