Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2012
Stenotic coexistence among coronary, renal and extracrainal arteries in Chinese patients.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A simple score for predicting renal artery stenosis in patients with ischemic heart disease.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the stenotic coexistence among coronary, renal and extracranial arteries and check the predictive value of stenosis between these arteries in Chinese patients. The stenosis of three arteries was evaluated by angiography in 1,228 Chinese patients with clinically diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD) or high CAD risk factors. Based on the criteria of stenotic diameter of ≥50%, we found that the rate of stenosis for the coronary artery was highest (48.5%), extracranial artery stenosis rate was intermediate at 20.2% and the renal artery with the stenosis rate of 14.3% was the lowest. The stenotic coexistence rates were 14.3% between the coronary and extracranial arteries, 10.9 % between coronary and renal arteries, 10.1% between the extracranial and renal arteries, and only 2.69% among all three arteries. The stenosis predictive value of the coronary artery for extracranial or renal arteries was lower, but the non-stenosis predictive value was higher. The predictive value of extracranial or renal artery for coronary artery stenosis was higher, while the non-stenosis predictive value was lower. Both the stenosis and non-stenosis predictive values were higher between the extracranial and renal arteries. Cohen's Kappa value was less than 0.40 between coronary and extracrainal or renal artery but more than 0.40 between extracranial and renal artery. The results were similar when the criteria of stenosis were judged as ≥75 or ≥25% respectively. We also did analysis within the subgroups with hypertension, diabetes, stroke and transient ischemia attach, got similar results. For Chinese patients with clinically diagnosed CAD or with highly risk factors, non-stenosis of the coronary artery is indicative of reduced stenosis of the extracranial and renal arteries, while extracranial or renal arteries stenosis is indicative of increased coronary artery stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22802079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.