Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22802018›Full record

ArticleCell stress & chaperones2013

Gene regulatory network of unfolded protein response genes in endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Sayuri Takayanagi, Riga Fukuda, Yuuki Takeuchi, Sakiko Tsukada, Kenichi Yoshida

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stress & chaperones, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. HSAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Aberrant Splicing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Type I interferons and endoplasmic reticulum stress in health and disease.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sayuri TakayanagiDepartment of Life Sciences, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashimita, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 214-8571, Japan.
Riga Fukuda
Yuuki Takeuchi
Sakiko Tsukada
Kenichi Yoshida
Meiji University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), secretory and membrane proteins are properly folded and modified, and the failure of these processes leads to ER stress. At the same time, unfolded protein response (UPR) genes are activated to maintain homeostasis. Despite the thorough characterization of the individual gene regulation of UPR genes to date, further investigation of the mutual regulation among UPR genes is required to understand the complex mechanism underlying the ER stress response. In this study, we aimed to reveal a gene regulatory network formed by UPR genes, including immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein (BiP), X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), C/EBP [CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein]-homologous protein (CHOP), PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring 1 (IRE1), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and ATF4. For this purpose, we focused on promoter-luciferase reporters for BiP, XBP1, and CHOP genes, which bear an ER stress response element (ERSE), and p5 × ATF6-GL3, which bears an unfolded protein response element (UPRE). We demonstrated that the luciferase activities of the BiP and CHOP promoters were upregulated by all the UPR genes, whereas those of the XBP1 promoter and p5 × ATF6-GL3 were upregulated by all the UPR genes except for BiP, CHOP, and ATF4 in HeLa cells. Therefore, an ERSE- and UPRE-centered gene regulatory network of UPR genes could be responsible for the robustness of the ER stress response. Finally, we revealed that BiP protein was degraded when cells were treated with DNA-damaging reagents, such as etoposide and doxorubicin; this finding suggests that the expression level of BiP is tightly regulated at the post-translational level, rather than at the transcriptional level, in the presence of DNA damage.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksActivating Transcription Factor 4Activating Transcription Factor 6Antineoplastic AgentsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDoxorubicinEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEtoposideHeat-Shock ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexActivating Transcription Factor 4Activating Transcription Factor 6Antineoplastic AgentsATF4 protein, humanATF6 protein, humanDDIT3 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDoxorubicinEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEtoposideHeat-Shock ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsTranscription Factor CHOPTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1XBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22802018
PMCPMC3508129
OpenAlexW1992319922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.