Trial reportHaematologica2013
Retrospective comparison of clofarabine versus fludarabine in combination with high-dose cytarabine with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as salvage therapies for acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clofarabine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: High response rates and effective bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Cancer medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- G-CSF priming, clofarabine, and high dose cytarabine (GCLAC) for upfront treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, advanced myelodysplastic syndrome or advanced myeloproliferative neoplasm.American journal of hematology · 2015Trial
- Second chances for secondary AML.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Clofarabine and total body irradiation (TBI) as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in high-risk acute leukemia patients: a two-center retrospective cohort study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Observational
- Early autologous and allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for adult patients with acute B and T cell precursor neoplasms: a 12-year single center experience.Annals of hematology · 2021Article
- Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2019Review
- Article
- Comparison of clinical remission and survival between CLAG and FLAG induction chemotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a prospective cohort study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018Article
- Current Approaches in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2015Article
- A phase I study of fludarabine, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We recently reported that clofarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCLAC) produced a 46% complete remission rate in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. GCLAC differs from FLAG by substitution of clofarabine for fludarabine, raising the question of the relative efficacy of these two regimens. We compared GCLAC given at the University of Washington Medical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center to fludarabine and cytarabine (FA) and FLAG given at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Independent multivariate analyses conducted at both institutions showed that after accounting for duration of first complete remission, salvage number, age, and cytogenetics, GCLAC was associated with a higher complete remission rate (odds ratio 9.57, P<0.0001) and longer survival (mortality hazard ratio 0.43, P=0.0002). Despite the retrospective nature of the analyses, GCLAC may be superior to FA/FLAG, particularly in patients with short duration of first complete remission or unfavorable cytogenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.