ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2012
[Diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis: avoidance of urinary diversion in cases of hydronephrosis and non-specific fever].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urosepsis--Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are individual cases especially of elderly or palliative patients with hydronephrosis and non-specific fever where a urinary diversion should be avoided in favor of quality of life. For these purposes this study presents the method and the results obtained with a diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis.
methodsDemographic data, indications for urinary diversion and the disease leading to hydronephrosis were retrospectively recorded from the operation reports of all percutanous nephrostomy procedures from 2007 to 2012. All cases in which a diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis was conducted to potentially avoid placing a nephrostomy tube were considered separately.
resultsFrom January 2007 to May 2012 a total of 476 percutanous nephrostomies were accomplished in this department. The most frequent indication for nephrostomy was acute renal failure in 55.3% of cases followed by septic laboratory constellations (33.1%) and colic (10.9%). Of the 148 cases of hydronephrosis combined with sepsis, a diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis was accomplished in 20.1%. In these cases the hydronephrosis had an underlying urological origin in 71.0%, reaching statistical significance with reference to the complete collective (p=0.034). In 21 out of 34 nephrology units (61.8%) it was possible to avoid nephrostomy due to clear urine and immediate urinanalysis without any evidence for infection. In the other cases a nephrostomy tube was placed.
conclusionsUsing a diagnostic puncture of the renal pelvis a nephrostomy could be avoided in over 50% of cases with a combination of hydronephrosis and non-specific fever in favor of quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.