Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22801777›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2012

Dicentric chromosomes: unique models to study centromere function and inactivation.

Kaitlin M Stimpson, Justyne E Matheny, Beth A Sullivan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Revisiting the question: When is a centromere not a kinetochore?Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SETD2 safeguards the genome against isochromosome formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Space Breeding: The Next-Generation Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaitlin M StimpsonInstitute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Justyne E Matheny
Beth A Sullivan
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Dicentric chromosome formation and stability in humansR01GM098500 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SULLIVAN, BETH A · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Epigenomic Mechanisms of Centromere Function and Chromosome RearrangementsF31AG034749 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STIMPSON, KAITLIN MARIE · 2010 to 2011
$60k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG034749NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dicentric chromosomes are products of genome rearrangement that place two centromeres on the same chromosome. Depending on the organism, dicentric stability varies after formation. In humans, dicentrics occur naturally in a substantial portion of the population and usually segregate successfully in mitosis and meiosis. Their stability has been attributed to inactivation of one of the two centromeres, creating a functionally monocentric chromosome that can segregate normally during cell division. The molecular basis for centromere inactivation is not well understood, although studies in model organisms and in humans suggest that genomic and epigenetic mechanisms can be involved. Furthermore, constitutional dicentric chromosomes ascertained in patients presumably represent the most stable chromosomes, so the spectrum of dicentric fates, if it exists, is not entirely clear. Studies of engineered or induced dicentrics in budding yeast and plants have provided significant insight into the fate of dicentric chromosomes. And, more recently, studies have shown that dicentrics in humans can also undergo multiple fates after formation. Here, we discuss current experimental evidence from various organisms that has deepened our understanding of dicentric behavior and the intriguingly complex process of centromere inactivation.

Indexed as

AutoantigensCentromereCentromere Protein AChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosomes, FungalChromosomes, HumanChromosomes, PlantEpigenesis, GeneticGene SilencingHistonesHumansPlantsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesSpecies SpecificityTranslocation, GeneticAutoantigensCentromere Protein AChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneHistones

Identifiers

PMID22801777
PMCPMC3557915
OpenAlexW2148225556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.