Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22801416›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2012

Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies.

S H Kasmas, M C Izar, C N França, S C Ramos, F T Moreira, T Helfenstein, R A Moreno, N C Borges, A M Figueiredo-Neto, F A Fonseca

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02428374 (Role of Innate and Adaptive Immunity After Acute Myocardial Infarction BATTLE-AMI Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02428374 phase4unknown statusstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Role of Innate and Adaptive Immunity After Acute Myocardial Infarction BATTLE-AMI Study (B And T Types of Lymphocytes Evaluation in Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Ran2015Enrolled300Registered outcomes30Posted comparisons0ConditionsMyocardial FibrosisArmsRosuvastatin plus clopidogrel, Rosuvastatin plus ticagrelor, Simvastatin plus clopidogrel, Simvastatin plus ticagrelor
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S H KasmasDivisão de Cardiologia, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
M C Izar
C N França
S C Ramos
F T Moreira
T Helfenstein
R A Moreno
N C Borges
A M Figueiredo-Neto
F A Fonseca
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRBrazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsAzetidinesBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLDrug Therapy, CombinationEzetimibeFemaleFluorobenzenesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnticholesteremic AgentsAzetidinesBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeFluorobenzenesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSimvastatinSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID22801416
PMCPMC3854149
OpenAlexW2135589992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.