ReviewDermatologic clinics2012
New approaches to melanoma prevention.
Review in Dermatologic clinics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin D, melanoma risk, and tumor thickness in PLCO cancer screening trial patients.JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants · 2020Article
- Assessing a novel immuno-oncology-based combination therapy: Ipilimumab plus electrochemotherapy.Oncoimmunology · 2015Article
- Electrochemotherapy in melanoma patients: a single institution experience.Melanoma management · 2015Article
- Associations between seasonal sleep change and indoor tanning.Psychological reports · 2015Article
- Decreases in tanning behaviors following a short online survey: Potential for prevention?Preventive medicine reports · 2015Article
- Strategies to reduce indoor tanning: current research gaps and future opportunities for prevention.American journal of preventive medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer is a major public health concern, and tanning remains a modifiable risk factor. Multidimensional influences, including psychosocial, individual, environmental, and policy-related factors, create the milieu for individuals to engage in tanning. Parents and physicians can modify the behavior of teens and young adults using strategies based on harm reduction. Environmental and policy-related factors similar to those used to limit smoking by restricting access of minors to cigarettes in the United States in the 20th century need to be created. Federal regulations can restrict direct advertising and the excise tax can be increased to a prohibitive amount. Social networking may assist with affect regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.