Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22798537›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2012

Usability of a CKD educational website targeted to patients and their family members.

Clarissa J Diamantidis, Marni Zuckerman, Wanda Fink, Peter Hu, Shiming Yang, Jeffrey C Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clarissa J DiamantidisDivision of Nephrology and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. cdiamantidis@medicine.umaryland.edu
Marni Zuckerman
Wanda Fink
Peter Hu
Shiming Yang
Jeffrey C Fink

Funding

Does underrecognition of kidney disease affect patient safety?R01DK084017 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FINK, JEFFREY C · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK084017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWeb-based technology is critical to the future of healthcare. As part of the Safe Kidney Care cohort study evaluating patient safety in CKD, this study determined how effectively a representative sample of patients with CKD or family members could interpret and use the Safe Kidney Care website (www.safekidneycare.org), an informational website on safety in CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between November of 2011 and January of 2012, persons with CKD or their family members underwent formal usability testing administered by a single interviewer with a second recording observer. Each participant was independently provided a list of 21 tasks to complete, with each task rated as either easily completed/noncritical error or critical error (user cannot complete the task without significant interviewer intervention).

resultsTwelve participants completed formal usability testing. Median completion time for all tasks was 17.5 minutes (range=10-44 minutes). In total, 10 participants had greater than or equal to one critical error. There were 55 critical errors in 252 tasks (22%), with the highest proportion of critical errors occurring when participants were asked to find information on treatments that may damage kidneys, find the website on the internet, increase font size, and scroll to the bottom of the webpage. Participants were generally satisfied with the content and usability of the website.

conclusionsWeb-based educational materials for patients with CKD should target a wide range of computer literacy levels and anticipate variability in competency in use of the computer and internet.

Indexed as

Access to InformationAttitude to ComputersHealth Information SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternetPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedComputer LiteracyFamilyFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInterviews as TopicMale

Identifiers

PMID22798537
PMCPMC3463209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.