Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22797937›Full record

ArticleInvertebrate neuroscience : IN2012

Induction and inhibition of an apparent neuronal phenotype in Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells (Sf21) by chemical agents.

Lacey J Jenson, Sally L Paulson, Jeffrey R Bloomquist

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Invertebrate neuroscience : IN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lacey J JensonDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, Neurotoxicology Laboratory, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, 2055 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610-0006, USA.
Sally L Paulson
Jeffrey R Bloomquist
University of Florida · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this research was to induce neuron-like properties in Sf21 cells, an insect ovarian cell line, which could lead to a new high-throughput insecticide screening method and a way to mass produce insect neuronal material for basic research. This study applied differentiation agents to produce viable neuron-like cells. In the presence of the molting hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20-HE), or insulin, in the growth medium, a maximum of ca. 30 % of Sf21 cells expressed an apparent neuronal morphology of unipolar, bipolar, or multipolar axon-like processes within 2-3 days. Maximal differentiation occurred after 2 days in the presence of 50 μM 20-HE or 3 days in 10 μM insulin. Both 20-HE and insulin displayed time- and concentration-dependent differentiation with biphasic curves, suggesting that two binding sites or processes were contributing to the observed effects. In addition, combinations of 20-HE and insulin produced apparent synergistic effects on differentiation. Caffeine, a central nervous system stimulant, inhibited induction of elongated processes by 20-HE and/or insulin, with an IC(50) of 9 nM for 20-HE, and the inhibition was incomplete, resulting in about one-quarter of the differentiated cells remaining, even at high concentrations (up to 1 mM). The ability to induce a neural phenotype simplifies the studies of insect cells, compared to either the use of primary nervous tissue or genetic engineering techniques. The presence of ion channels or receptors in the differentiated cells remains to be determined.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaffeineCell DifferentiationEcdysteroneInsulinNeuronsPhenotypeSf9 CellsSpodopteraCaffeineEcdysteroneInsulin

Identifiers

PMID22797937
OpenAlexW2170767341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.