Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22797927›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2012

Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation.

Akiko Mammoto, Tadanori Mammoto, Donald E Ingber

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 394 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TTNCell reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Mechanoepigenetics in musculoskeletal disease.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Endothelial Surface Glycocalyx in Vascular Functions and Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akiko MammotoVascular Biology Program, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Tadanori Mammoto
Donald E Ingber
Harvard University · USBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

TUMOR DORMANCY INDUCED BY BLOCKED ANGIOGENESISP01CA045548 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI KLAGSBRUN, MICHAEL · 1987 to 2011
$22.6M
Micromechanical Determinants of Organ Design and Engineering (SysCODE 6 of 10)RL1DE019023 · NIDCR · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI INGBER, DONALD E · 2007 to 2011
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA45548NCI NIH HHS P01 CA045548NIDCR NIH HHS DE019023NIDCR NIH HHS RL1 DE019023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation contributes to the maintenance of pluripotency, self-renewal and differentiation in embryonic cells and in stem cells. Therefore, control of gene expression at the level of transcription is crucial for embryonic development, as well as for organogenesis, functional adaptation, and regeneration in adult tissues and organs. In the past, most work has focused on how transcriptional regulation results from the complex interplay between chemical cues, adhesion signals, transcription factors and their co-regulators during development. However, chemical signaling alone is not sufficient to explain how three-dimensional (3D) tissues and organs are constructed and maintained through the spatiotemporal control of transcriptional activities. Accumulated evidence indicates that mechanical cues, which include physical forces (e.g. tension, compression or shear stress), alterations in extracellular matrix (ECM) mechanics and changes in cell shape, are transmitted to the nucleus directly or indirectly to orchestrate transcriptional activities that are crucial for embryogenesis and organogenesis. In this Commentary, we review how the mechanical control of gene transcription contributes to the maintenance of pluripotency, determination of cell fate, pattern formation and organogenesis, as well as how it is involved in the control of cell and tissue function throughout embryogenesis and adult life. A deeper understanding of these mechanosensitive transcriptional control mechanisms should lead to new approaches to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMechanotransduction, CellularTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBody PatterningCell Adhesion MoleculesCell ShapeEmbryonic DevelopmentEndothelial CellsExtracellular MatrixHumansOrganogenesisStress, MechanicalTranscription FactorsCell Adhesion MoleculesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22797927
PMCPMC3434847
OpenAlexW2097444304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.