ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012
A public resource facilitating clinical use of genomes.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic and Comprehensive Review on Disease-Causing Genes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2020Pooled it
- Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Trial
- Personalized genomic disease risk of volunteers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Trial
- Article
- Article
- Characterization of subclonal variants in HG002 Genome in a Bottle reference material as a resource for benchmarking variant callers.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- The Impact of Structural Variation on Alzheimer's Disease in the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project.Research square · 2026Article
- GeNePi: a graphics processing unit enhanced next-generation bioinformatics pipeline for whole-genome sequencing analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A complete diploid human genome benchmark for personalized genomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Interlaboratory assessment of candidate reference materials for lentiviral vector copy number and integration site measurements.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- GoldPolish-target: targeted long-read genome assembly polishing.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Small variant benchmark from a complete assembly of X and Y chromosomes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A robust benchmark for detecting low-frequency variants in the HG002 Genome In A Bottle NIST reference material.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Genomic reproducibility in the bioinformatics era.Genome biology · 2024Review
- Review
- A cost-effective sequencing method for genetic studies combining high-depth whole exome and low-depth whole genome.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Reliable multiplex generation of pooled induced pluripotent stem cells.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- Modeling of mitochondrial genetic polymorphisms reveals induction of heteroplasmy by pleiotropic disease locus 10398A>G.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Enhancing genomic mutation data storage optimization based on the compression of asymmetry of sparsity.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid advances in DNA sequencing promise to enable new diagnostics and individualized therapies. Achieving personalized medicine, however, will require extensive research on highly reidentifiable, integrated datasets of genomic and health information. To assist with this, participants in the Personal Genome Project choose to forgo privacy via our institutional review board- approved "open consent" process. The contribution of public data and samples facilitates both scientific discovery and standardization of methods. We present our findings after enrollment of more than 1,800 participants, including whole-genome sequencing of 10 pilot participant genomes (the PGP-10). We introduce the Genome-Environment-Trait Evidence (GET-Evidence) system. This tool automatically processes genomes and prioritizes both published and novel variants for interpretation. In the process of reviewing the presumed healthy PGP-10 genomes, we find numerous literature references implying serious disease. Although it is sometimes impossible to rule out a late-onset effect, stringent evidence requirements can address the high rate of incidental findings. To that end we develop a peer production system for recording and organizing variant evaluations according to standard evidence guidelines, creating a public forum for reaching consensus on interpretation of clinically relevant variants. Genome analysis becomes a two-step process: using a prioritized list to record variant evaluations, then automatically sorting reviewed variants using these annotations. Genome data, health and trait information, participant samples, and variant interpretations are all shared in the public domain-we invite others to review our results using our participant samples and contribute to our interpretations. We offer our public resource and methods to further personalized medical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.