Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22797897›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Regulatory element copy number differences shape primate expression profiles.

Rebecca C Iskow, Omer Gokcumen, Alexej Abyzov, Joanna Malukiewicz, Qihui Zhu, Ann T Sukumar, Athma A Pai, Ryan E Mills, Lukas Habegger, Darren A Cusanovich and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic medicine goes mainstream.NPJ genomic medicine · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative studies of gene regulatory mechanisms.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  19. Comparative analysis of pseudogenes across three phyla.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rebecca C IskowDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Omer Gokcumen
Alexej Abyzov
Joanna Malukiewicz
Qihui Zhu
Ann T Sukumar
Athma A Pai
Ryan E Mills
Lukas Habegger
Darren A Cusanovich
Meagan A Rubel
George H Perry
Mark Gerstein
Anne C Stone
Yoav Gilad
Charles Lee

Funding

VASCULAR, PULMONARY AND RENAL INJURYT32HL007627 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GIMBRONE, MICHAEL A, MITCHELL, RICHARD N · 1985 to 2019
$12.7M
Copy number variation in the human genomeP41HG004221 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, CHARLES · 2007 to 2010
$5.4M
Characterization and Evolution of Copy Number Variation Among PrimatesR01GM081533 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, CHARLES · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
The Role of Somatic Copy Number Changes in AgingF32AG039979 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TORENE, REBECCA I · 2011 to 2013
$76k
NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG004221NHGRI NIH HHS P41HG004221NHLBI NIH HHS 2T32HL007627-26NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007627NIA NIH HHS F32 AG039979NIA NIH HHS F32AG039979NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081533NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression differences are shaped by selective pressures and contribute to phenotypic differences between species. We identified 964 copy number differences (CNDs) of conserved sequences across three primate species and examined their potential effects on gene expression profiles. Samples with copy number different genes had significantly different expression than samples with neutral copy number. Genes encoding regulatory molecules differed in copy number and were associated with significant expression differences. Additionally, we identified 127 CNDs that were processed pseudogenes and some of which were expressed. Furthermore, there were copy number-different regulatory regions such as ultraconserved elements and long intergenic noncoding RNAs with the potential to affect expression. We postulate that CNDs of these conserved sequences fine-tune developmental pathways by altering the levels of RNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineDNA, IntergenicGene DosageGene Expression RegulationHumansMacaca mulattaPan troglodytesPseudogenesRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalRNA, UntranslatedSpecies SpecificityDNA, IntergenicRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID22797897
PMCPMC3411951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.