ArticleTransplantation2012
Development and tolerization of hyperacute rejection in a transgenic mouse graft versus host model.
Article in Transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Restoring immune tolerance in neuromyelitis optica: Part I.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe hyperacute rejection mediated by preexisting antibodies is a major impediment to the success of transplants across allogeneic and xenogeneic barriers. We report a new mouse model that allows us to not only monitor the sensitization of B cells mediating the hyperacute response but also validate therapeutic strategies for tolerizing them. MODEL: The new model system uses 5C.C7,RAG2 T-cell receptor transgenic T cells and B10.S(9R),CD3[Latin Small Letter Open E] hosts for adoptive transfer experiments. RESULTS AND
conclusionsIn the allogeneic hosts, transgenic T cells expanded briefly before being chronically deleted. Once the deletion was initiated, a second graft of donor cells was used to assess a hyperacute response. The rapid rejection of the second cohort correlated with the appearance of donor-specific antibodies in the serum. Interestingly, chronically stimulated T cells were relatively resistant to hyperacute rejection, suggesting an explanation for the slower rejection kinetics of the first cohort even as the second cohort of identical donor cells was being hyperacutely rejected. Finally, we could tolerize the potential for a hyperacute response, by pretreating recipients with a single infusion of naive donor B cells before the first T-cell transfer. This treatment not only abrogated the development of a hyperacute response but also allowed the primary graft to survive in vivo for extended periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.