Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22796302›Full record

SynthesisPatient education and counseling2012

A systematic review of cognitive behavioral interventions in advanced cancer.

Cathy L Campbell, Lisa C Campbell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03258450 (The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Psychosocial Intervention for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03258450 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Psychosocial Intervention for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2017 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsColorectal NeoplasmsArmsPsycho-behavioural intervention arm (PBI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of psychological interventions for patients with head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epidemiological trends and risk factors of gynecological cancers: an update.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical considerations for working with patients with advanced cancer.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2014
    Review
  12. Mind-body therapies: evidence and implications in advanced oncology practice.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cathy L CampbellDepartment of Acute and Specialty Care, University of Virginia, School of Nursing, Charlottesville 222908, USA. clc5t@virginia.edu
Lisa C Campbell
East Carolina University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer Recovery Enhancement (PROCARE) for African American MenR01CA122704 · NCI · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, LISA C · 2007 to 2010
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS 3R01CA122704-03S1NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA122704-04NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review cognitive behavioral interventions for people with advanced cancer.

methodsA literature search was conducted using Medline©, CINAHL©, and Psych-info©. INCLUSION CRITERIA: studies were included in the review if they met the following criteria: (1) the design was a randomized clinical trial, (2) the study tested a cognitive behavioral therapy, including psycho-educational, alternative and complementary therapies (i.e. acupuncture, relaxation), expressive, support and skill building interventions, (3) participants were adults (18 years of age or older) with advanced cancer and the (4) outcomes were directly related to the patient with advanced cancer.

results11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies in the review: treatment effects were not statistically significant in most studies, methods were not consistently described, and samples had limited racial/ethnic diversity.

conclusionThe interpretation of the effectiveness of the CBIs was limited by major challenges to the internal validity of the studies included in the review. The lack of data about the efficacy of CBIs to support people with advanced cancer is a gap in the current knowledge base. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Given the needs of people living with advanced cancer well-designed studies are needed to test interventions that will improve outcomes for people living with advanced cancer.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyComplementary TherapiesHumansNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22796302
PMCPMC3462275
OpenAlexW2067433459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.