Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22796229›Full record

SynthesisEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology2013

Meta-analysis of increased heart rate and blood pressure associated with CNS stimulant treatment of ADHD in adults.

Eric Mick, David D McManus, Robert J Goldberg

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric MickDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. eric.mick@umassmed.edu
David D McManus
Robert J Goldberg
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE CORE FACILITYP30HD004147 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MCILVANE, WILLIAM J · 1985 to 2014
$9.1M
WORCHESTER HEART ATTACK COMMUNITY SURVEILLANCE STUDYR01HL035434 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GOLDBERG, ROBERT JOEL · 1987 to 2014
$7.4M
Monitoring Community Trends in Heart FailureR37HL069874 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GOLDBERG, ROBERT JOEL · 2002 to 2011
$6.7M
TRACE-COREU01HL105268 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KIEFE, CATARINA I. · 2010 to 2013
$5.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL035434NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL069874NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105268NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD004147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to children, adults with ADHD are at greater risk for developing adverse cardiovascular related outcomes and, if treated, may be likely to carry a greater burden of exposure to stimulant medications. The goal of this report is to critically review the available literature relevant to the cardiovascular safety of CNS stimulants for adult ADHD (aADHD). Twenty potential clinical trials of a CNS stimulant for aADHD have been published between 1979 and 2012. Of these, ten presented sufficient data to estimate the relative change in various cardiovascular parameters associated with ADHD treatment modalities. These trials were predominantly focused on long-acting stimulant preparations for acute symptom reduction (median duration=6 weeks, range: 4-24 weeks) and enrolled relatively young subjects (median age=36 years, range: 22-40). Using random effects meta-analysis, we found that subjects randomized to CNS stimulant treatment demonstrated a statistically significant increased resting heart rate [+5.7bpm (3.6, 7.8), p<0.001] and systolic blood pressure findings [+2.0mmHg (0.8, 3.2), p=0.005] compared with subjects randomized to placebo. There was a statistically significant increased risk for a resting heart rate >90bpm [4.2% (n=50) vs. 1.7% (n=8), OR=2.75 (1.3, 6.7), p=0.006] associated with CNS stimulant treatment. In light of prognostic value of resting heart rate with regard to cardiovascular morbidity in epidemiological studies, future research of adults with ADHD should focus on the potential clinical impact of the increase in heart rate observed in this meta-analysis.

Indexed as

AgingAdultAgedAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBlood PressureCentral Nervous System StimulantsHeart RateHumansHypertensionMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTachycardiaCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID22796229
PMCPMC3488604
OpenAlexW2093330791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.