Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22796035›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2012

Comparison of fast-track diagnostics respiratory pathogens multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay with in-house singleplex assays for comprehensive detection of human respiratory viruses.

Senthilkumar K Sakthivel, Brett Whitaker, Xiaoyan Lu, Danielle B L Oliveira, Lauren J Stockman, Shifaq Kamili, M Steven Oberste, Dean D Erdman

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nucleic acid amplification tests on respiratory samples for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical impact of rapid molecular detection of respiratory pathogens in patients with acute respiratory infection.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surveillance for Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Pediatric Chronic Care Facilities.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lower cost alternatives for molecular diagnosis of COVID-19: conventional RT-PCR and SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Senthilkumar K SakthivelDivision of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Brett Whitaker
Xiaoyan Lu
Danielle B L Oliveira
Lauren J Stockman
Shifaq Kamili
M Steven Oberste
Dean D Erdman
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USAtlanta Research and Education Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast-track Diagnostics respiratory pathogens (FTDRP) multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay was compared with in-house singleplex real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of 16 common respiratory viruses. The FTDRP assay correctly identified 26 diverse respiratory virus strains, 35 of 41 (85%) external quality assessment samples spiked with cultured virus and 232 of 263 (88%) archived respiratory specimens that tested positive for respiratory viruses by in-house assays. Of 308 prospectively tested respiratory specimens selected from children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness, 270 (87.7%) and 265 (86%) were positive by FTDRP and in-house assays for one or more viruses, respectively, with combined test results showing good concordance (K=0.812, 95% CI=0.786-0.838). Individual FTDRP assays for adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus showed the lowest comparative sensitivities with in-house assays, with most discrepancies occurring with specimens containing low virus loads and failed to detect some rhinovirus strains, even when abundant. The FTDRP enterovirus and human bocavirus assays appeared to be more sensitive than the in-house assays with some specimens. With the exceptions noted above, most FTDRP assays performed comparably with in-house assays for most viruses while offering enhanced throughput and easy integration by laboratories using conventional real-time PCR instrumentation.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAdenoviridaeAdenovirus Infections, HumanHumansNasopharyngeal DiseasesPicornaviridae InfectionsProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRhinovirusSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsViral LoadReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID22796035
PMCPMC7119496
OpenAlexW2112482041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.