Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22794507›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2012

International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.

M Slade, M Leamy, F Bacon, M Janosik, C Le Boutillier, J Williams, V Bird

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06284096 (Effect Of CHIME Based Group Psychoeducation On Personel Recovery In Individuals Diagnosed With Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06284096 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect Of CHIME Based Group Psychoeducation On Personel Recovery In Individuals Diagnosed With Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsMental Health Recovery, SchizophreniaArmsPsychoeducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Turning to Service Users for the Understanding of Current and Future Mental Health Services in the Development Process of Research and Practice: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M SladeKing's College, London, UK. m.slade@iop.kcl.ac.uk
M Leamy
F Bacon
M Janosik
C Le Boutillier
J Williams
V Bird

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMental health policy internationally varies in its support for recovery. The aims of this study were to validate an existing conceptual framework and then characterise by country the distribution, scientific foundations and emphasis in published recovery conceptualisations.

methodsUpdate and modification of a previously published systematic review and narrative synthesis of recovery conceptualisations published in English.

resultsA total of 7431 studies were identified and 429 full papers reviewed, from which 105 conceptualisations in 115 papers were included and quality assessed using established rating scales. Recovery conceptualisations were identified from 11 individual countries, with 95 (91%) published in English-speaking countries, primarily the USA (47%) and the UK (25%). The scientific foundation was primarily qualitative research (53%), non-systematic literature reviews (24%) and position papers (12%). The conceptual framework was validated with the 18 new papers. Across the different countries, there was a relatively similar distribution of codings for each of five key recovery processes.

conclusionsRecovery as currently conceptualised in English-language publications is primarily based on qualitative studies and position papers from English-speaking countries. The conceptual framework was valid, but the development of recovery conceptualisations using a broader range of research designs within other cultures and non-majority populations is a research priority.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAfricaAsiaCanadaEuropeHumansMental DisordersRecovery of FunctionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22794507
PMCPMC6998141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.