Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22794306›Full record

SynthesisGynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology2012

A systematic review of dydrogesterone for the treatment of threatened miscarriage.

Howard Carp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02262481 (A Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial of Oral Progestogen Supplementation in the Prevention of Recurrent Uterine Contraction in Preterm Labor), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02262481 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial of Oral Progestogen Supplementation in the Prevention of Recurrent Uterine Contraction in Preterm Labor

TypeinterventionalSponsorChulalongkorn UniversityRan2014 to 2015Enrolled48ConditionsPreterm LaborArmsdydrogesterone, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Progesterone modulates the T-cell response via glucocorticoid receptor-dependent pathways.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Howard CarpDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. carp@netvision.net.il
Sheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to assess whether the orally acting progestagen, dydrogesterone lowers the incidence of miscarriage in women with threatened miscarriage. A computerized search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Ovid Medline for original reports with the product name 'Duphaston' or 'dydrogesterone', and limited to clinical human data. Twenty-one reports of dydrogesterone treatment were identified with 1380 patients. Five randomized trials were identified, including 660 women who fulfilled the criteria for meta-analysis. The number of subsequent miscarriages or continuing pregnancies per randomized woman was compared in women receiving dydrogesterone compared to standard bed rest or placebo intervention. There was a 13% (44/335) miscarriage rate after dydrogesterone administration compared to 24% in control women [odds ratio for miscarriage 0.47, (CI = 0.31-0.7), 11% absolute reduction in the miscarriage rate]. The adverse and side effects were summarized in all 21 reports, and seemed to be minimal. Although all the predictive and confounding factors could not be controlled for, the results of this systematic review show a significant reduction of 47% in the odds for miscarriage when dydrogesterone is compared to standard care indicating a real treatment effect.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAbortion, ThreatenedAdministration, OralDydrogesteroneEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyProgestinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDydrogesteroneProgestins

Identifiers

PMID22794306
PMCPMC3518297
OpenAlexW2058932581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.