Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22794194›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2012

Mental health care as delivered by Dutch general practitioners between 2004 and 2008.

Peter F M Verhaak, Christel E van Dijk, Jasper Nuijen, Robert A Verheij, Francois G Schellevis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antidepressant use in relation to dementia risk, cognitive decline, and brain atrophy.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Use of general practice services 5 years after an episode of mental illness: case-control study using electronic records.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter F M VerhaakNIVEL, Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands. p.verhaak@nivel.nl
Christel E van Dijk
Jasper Nuijen
Robert A Verheij
Francois G Schellevis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the field of mental health care, a major role for general practice is advocated. However, not much is known about the treatment and referral of mental health problems in general practice. This study aims at the volume and nature of treatment of mental health problems in general practice; the degree to which treatment varies according to patients' gender, age, and social economic status; and trends in treatment and referral between 2004 and 2008. DESIGN/

settingDescriptive study with trends in time in general practice in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 350,000 patients enlisted in general practice, whose data from the Netherlands Information Network of General Practice were routinely collected from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008.

main outcome measuresFor all episodes of mental health problems recorded by the GP, the proportion of patients receiving prolonged attention, medication, and referral during each year have been calculated.

resultsMore than 75% of patients with a recorded mental health problem received some kind of treatment, most often medication. In 15-20% of cases medication was accompanied by prolonged attention; 9-13% of these patients were referred (given referrals), the majority to specialized mental health care. Age is the most important variable associated with treatment received. During the period 2004-2008, treatment with medication declined slightly and referrals increased slightly.

conclusionTreatment for psychological disorders is mostly delivered in general practice. Although in recent years restraint has been advocated in prescribing medication and collaboration between primary and secondary care has been recommended, these recommendations are only partially reflected in the treatment provided.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAge FactorsFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesNetherlandsRegression AnalysisSex FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID22794194
PMCPMC3443939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.