ArticleNeural plasticity2012
Development of brainstem-evoked responses in congenital auditory deprivation.
Article in Neural plasticity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hearing loss in juvenile rats leads to excessive play fighting and hyperactivity, mild cognitive deficits and altered neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex.Current research in neurobiology · 2024Article
- Processing of auditory information in forebrain regions after hearing loss in adulthood: Behavioral and electrophysiological studies in a rat model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The characterization of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms: A study in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri).Journal of otology · 2018Article
- Review
- Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model.The Lancet. Neurology · 2016Review
- Monaural Congenital Deafness Affects Aural Dominance and Degrades Binaural Processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016Article
- Delayed Auditory Brainstem Responses in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015Article
- Auditory feedback modulates development of kitten vocalizations.Cell and tissue research · 2015Article
- Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2015Article
- Hearing and age-related changes in the gray mouse lemur.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2014Article
- Auditory reserve and the legacy of auditory experience.Brain sciences · 2014Article
- Musical training heightens auditory brainstem function during sensitive periods in development.Frontiers in psychology · 2013Article
- Art and science: how musical training shapes the brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the development of the auditory system in hearing and completely acoustically deprived animals, naive congenitally deaf white cats (CDCs) and hearing controls (HCs) were investigated at different developmental stages from birth till adulthood. The CDCs had no hearing experience before the acute experiment. In both groups of animals, responses to cochlear implant stimulation were acutely assessed. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABRs) were recorded with monopolar stimulation at different current levels. CDCs demonstrated extensive development of E-ABRs, from first signs of responses at postnatal (p.n.) day 3 through appearance of all waves of brainstem response at day 8 p.n. to mature responses around day 90 p.n.. Wave I of E-ABRs could not be distinguished from the artifact in majority of CDCs, whereas in HCs, it was clearly separated from the stimulus artifact. Waves II, III, and IV demonstrated higher thresholds in CDCs, whereas this difference was not found for wave V. Amplitudes of wave III were significantly higher in HCs, whereas wave V amplitudes were significantly higher in CDCs. No differences in latencies were observed between the animal groups. These data demonstrate significant postnatal subcortical development in absence of hearing, and also divergent effects of deafness on early waves II-IV and wave V of the E-ABR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.