Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22792384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

A qualitative study of provider thoughts on implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in clinical settings to prevent HIV infection.

Emily A Arnold, Patrick Hazelton, Tim Lane, Katerina A Christopoulos, Gabriel R Galindo, Wayne T Steward, Stephen F Morin

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02768779 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

IGHID 11601 - Measuring Antiretroviral Concentrations in Hair

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2016 to 2017Enrolled84ConditionsHIVArmsHair analysis
NCT03617874 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

PC4PrEP: Integrating Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Into Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2020 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency Virus TransmissionArmsPC4PrEP- Intervention Clinics, Standard of Care Clinics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retrospective audit of a convenience cohort of individuals on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Alberta, Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Primary Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): Informing Network-Based Interventions.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily A ArnoldCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America. Emily.Arnold@ucsf.edu
Patrick Hazelton
Tim Lane
Katerina A Christopoulos
Gabriel R Galindo
Wayne T Steward
Stephen F Morin
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco AIDS Foundation · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Monica Gandhi · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
TRAINEESHIPS IN AIDS PREVENTION STUDIEST32MH019105 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Carol Suzanne Camlin, Glenn-Milo Santos · 1989 to 2026
$15.3M
Optimizing Rapid and Full Engagement in Care for Persons with Newly Diagnosed HIVK23MH092220 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTOPOULOS, KATERINA A · 2010 to 2013
$635k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIMH NIH HHS 2P30MH-062246NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH092220NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent clinical trial demonstrated that a daily dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabrine (TDF-FTC) can reduce HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender (TG) women by 44%, and up to 90% if taken daily. We explored how medical and service providers understand research results and plan to develop clinical protocols to prescribe, support and monitor adherence for patients on PrEP in the United States.

methodsUsing referrals from our community collaborators and snowball sampling, we recruited 22 healthcare providers in San Francisco, Oakland, and Los Angeles for in-depth interviews from May-December 2011. The providers included primary care physicians seeing high numbers of MSM and TG women, HIV specialists, community health clinic providers, and public health officials. We analyzed interviews thematically to produce recommendations for setting policy around implementing PrEP. Interview topics included: assessing clinician impressions of PrEP and CDC guidance, considerations of cost, office capacity, dosing schedules, and following patients over time.

resultsLittle or no demand for PrEP from patients was reported at the time of the interviews. Providers did not agree on the most appropriate patients for PrEP and believed that current models of care, which do not involve routine frequent office visits, were not well suited for prescribing PrEP. Providers detailed the need to build capacity and were concerned about monitoring side effects and adherence. PrEP was seen as potentially having impact on the epidemic but providers also noted that community education campaigns needed to be tailored to effectively reach specific vulnerable populations.

conclusionsWhile PrEP may be a novel and clinically compelling prevention intervention for MSM and TG women, it raises a number of important implementation challenges that would need to be addressed. Nonetheless, most providers expressed optimism that they eventually could prescribe and monitor PrEP in their practice.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCaliforniaChemopreventionFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandHIV InfectionsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationReimbursement MechanismsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22792384
PMCPMC3394704
OpenAlexW2156965100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.