Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22792154›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Job strain and tobacco smoking: an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 166,130 adults in 15 European studies.

Katriina Heikkilä, Solja T Nyberg, Eleonor I Fransson, Lars Alfredsson, Dirk De Bacquer, Jakob B Bjorner, Sébastien Bonenfant, Marianne Borritz, Hermann Burr, Els Clays and 40 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Associations of job strain and lifestyle risk factors with risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. International Empirical Validation and Value Added of the Multilevel Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) 2.0.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

50 authors.

Katriina HeikkiläFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland. katriina.heikkila@ttl.fi
Solja T Nyberg
Eleonor I Fransson
Lars Alfredsson
Dirk De Bacquer
Jakob B Bjorner
Sébastien Bonenfant
Marianne Borritz
Hermann Burr
Els Clays
Annalisa Casini
Nico Dragano
Raimund Erbel
Goedele A Geuskens
Marcel Goldberg
Wendela E Hooftman
Irene L Houtman
Matti Joensuu
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
France Kittel
Anders Knutsson
Markku Koskenvuo
Aki Koskinen
Anne Kouvonen
Constanze Leineweber
Thorsten Lunau
Ida E H Madsen
Linda L Magnusson Hanson
Michael G Marmot
Martin L Nielsen
Maria Nordin
Jaana Pentti
Paula Salo
Reiner Rugulies
Andrew Steptoe
Johannes Siegrist
Sakari Suominen
Jussi Vahtera
Marianna Virtanen
Ari Väänänen
Peter Westerholm
Hugo Westerlund
Marie Zins
Töres Theorell
Mark Hamer
Jane E Ferrie
Archana Singh-Manoux
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
IPD-Work Consortium

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco smoking is a major contributor to the public health burden and healthcare costs worldwide, but the determinants of smoking behaviours are poorly understood. We conducted a large individual-participant meta-analysis to examine the extent to which work-related stress, operationalised as job strain, is associated with tobacco smoking in working adults. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsWe analysed cross-sectional data from 15 European studies comprising 166,130 participants. Longitudinal data from six studies were used. Job strain and smoking were self-reported. Smoking was harmonised into three categories never, ex- and current. We modelled the cross-sectional associations using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to examine longitudinal associations. Of the 166,130 participants, 17% reported job strain, 42% were never smokers, 33% ex-smokers and 25% current smokers. In the analyses of the cross-sectional data, current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (age, sex and socioeconomic position-adjusted odds ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked, on average, three cigarettes per week more than current smokers without job strain. In the analyses of longitudinal data (1 to 9 years of follow-up), there was no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and taking up or quitting smoking.

conclusionsOur findings show that smokers are slightly more likely than non-smokers to report work-related stress. In addition, smokers who reported work stress smoked, on average, slightly more cigarettes than stress-free smokers.

Indexed as

SmokingStress, PsychologicalWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioSmoking CessationSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22792154
PMCPMC3391192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.