Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22792141›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Controlled breast cancer microarrays for the deconvolution of cellular multilayering and density effects upon drug responses.

Maria Håkanson, Stefan Kobel, Matthias P Lutolf, Marcus Textor, Edna Cukierman, Mirren Charnley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria HåkansonBioInterface Group, Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan Kobel
Matthias P Lutolf
Marcus Textor
Edna Cukierman
Mirren Charnley
ETH Zurich · CHBioengineering (Switzerland) · CHFox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

3D-Adhesion Stromagenesis in Cancer PermissivenessR01CA113451 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CUKIERMAN, EDNA · 2006 to 2016
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA113451NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing evidence shows that the cancer microenvironment affects both tumorigenesis and the response of cancer to drug treatment. Therefore in vitro models that selectively reflect characteristics of the in vivo environment are greatly needed. Current methods allow us to screen the effect of extrinsic parameters such as matrix composition and to model the complex and three-dimensional (3D) cancer environment. However, 3D models that reflect characteristics of the in vivo environment are typically too complex and do not allow the separation of discrete extrinsic parameters. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study we used a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel-based microwell array to model breast cancer cell behavior in multilayer cell clusters that allows a rigorous control of the environment. The innovative array fabrication enables different matrix proteins to be integrated into the bottom surface of microwells. Thereby, extrinsic parameters including dimensionality, type of matrix coating and the extent of cell-cell adhesion could be independently studied. Our results suggest that cell to matrix interactions and increased cell-cell adhesion, at high cell density, induce independent effects on the response to Taxol in multilayer breast cancer cell clusters. In addition, comparing the levels of apoptosis and proliferation revealed that drug resistance mediated by cell-cell adhesion can be related to altered cell cycle regulation. Conversely, the matrix-dependent response to Taxol did not correlate with proliferation changes suggesting that cell death inhibition may be responsible for this effect. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The application of the PEG hydrogel platform provided novel insight into the independent role of extrinsic parameters controlling drug response. The presented platform may not only become a useful tool for basic research related to the role of the cancer microenvironment but could also serve as a complementary platform for in vitro drug development.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCell AdhesionCell CountCell CycleCell DeathCell ProliferationDown-RegulationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateIntegrin beta1PaclitaxelPolyethylene GlycolsCadherinsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateIntegrin beta1PaclitaxelPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID22792141
PMCPMC3387021
OpenAlexW1984934999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.