Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22791273›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Prescription drug dispensing profiles for one million children: a population-based analysis.

Tingting Zhang, M Anne Smith, Pat G Camp, Salomah Shajari, Stuart M MacLeod, Bruce C Carleton

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Early microbiota, antibiotics and health.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ambulatory Care Visits to Pediatricians in Taiwan: A Nationwide Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tingting ZhangFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
M Anne Smith
Pat G Camp
Salomah Shajari
Stuart M MacLeod
Bruce C Carleton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based drug utilization databases that comprehensively capture an entire population's drug dispensing are scarce resources for epidemiological studies. This study aimed to examine the prescription-dispensing rates in children in British Columbia (BC) and describe the differences in the dispensing of medications in BC versus children in the United States (US) and Europe.

methodsThe study population was children aged 0-17 years in BC (n = 855,541). Children with at least one prescription dispensed in 2007 were identified using the provincial outpatient prescription dispensing database. All prescriptions were grouped on the basis of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Prevalence of drug dispensing was calculated in each age group, gender, and therapeutic class.

resultsFifty-five percent of BC children were dispensed at least one prescription in 2007. Antibacterials for systemic use, dermatological corticosteroids, and drugs for obstructive airway diseases were commonly dispensed in each age group. The percentage of children who received psychoanaleptics was two to five times higher than rates reported in European countries, but 30% lower than rates reported in the US.

conclusionsHalf of the BC population <18 years received at least one prescription in 2007. Significant variations in drug dispensing were highlighted between BC, the US, and Europe. Future studies are needed to examine the outcomes of the prescribing in terms of benefit and harm. A variety of factors (e.g., disease prevalence rates, drug prescribing preferences) are likely to contribute to disparate dispensing of specific drug classes and should be principal factors in the investigation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAmbulatory CareBritish ColumbiaChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolDrug UtilizationDrug Utilization ReviewEuropeFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.