Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22790563›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2012

The management of vertebral artery injury in anterior cervical spine operation: a systematic review of published cases.

Hyung-Ki Park, Hae-Dong Jho

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of Vertebral artery anomaly in upper cervical and its surgical implications: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyung-Ki ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, 22 Daesagwan-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 140-743, South Korea. schnsphk@gmail.com
Hae-Dong Jho
Drexel University · USSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnterior cervical spine operations (ACSO) are generally considered to be safe and effective, but the vertebral artery (VA) is at risk during the procedure. Because the consequences of VA injury can be catastrophic, properly managing a VA injury is very important. However, due to the rarity of these injuries, there is no agreed upon treatment strategy.

methodsStudies were identified for inclusion in the review via sensitive searches of electronic databases through 31 December 2011. All cases included in the review were qualitatively analyzed to explore the relationship between type of VA injury management and neurological complications.

resultsSeventeen articles describing 39 cases of VA injury during ACSO were included in this study. Seven patients (17.9 %) had neurological complications followed by VA insufficiency. Two patients (5.1 %) had root damage due to ligation. One case (2.6 %) resulted in intraoperative death due to fatal bleeding. Delayed vascular complications were identified in nine (45.0 %) of the 20 patients that underwent only tamponade or hemostatic agent during the operation. Four patients underwent intraoperative endovascular treatment, and three of these patients had a cerebral infarction. All three patients who underwent clipping also had neurological complications. The five patients treated by direct repair did not have any complications.

conclusionOur review suggests the management of VA injury should be considered in order listed: (1) performing tamponade with a hemostatic agent, (2) direct repair, (3) postoperative endovascular procedures to prevent delayed complications. If tamponade fails to achieve proper hemostasis, additional procedures as endovascular embolization, clipping and ligation should be considered but carry the risk of neurological complications. Because of the limitations of this review, further studies are recommended with larger sample sizes.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeHumansOrthopedic ProceduresSpinal InjuriesVertebral Artery

Identifiers

PMID22790563
PMCPMC3508242
OpenAlexW2059842845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.