Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22790537›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Antimicrobial susceptibility and synergy studies of cystic fibrosis sputum by direct sputum sensitivity testing.

D J Serisier, A Tuck, D Matley, M P Carroll, G Jones

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anti-Fungal (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  8. Molecular detection of CF lung pathogens: current status and future potential.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

D J SerisierDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and University of Qld, Mater Adult Hospital Infection, Inflammation and Immunity Program, Mater Medical Research Institute, Lvl 9, Raymond Tce., South Brisbane, QLD, Australia. david.serisier@mater.org.au
A Tuck
D Matley
M P Carroll
G Jones
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBMater Adult Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (C+S) on individual Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonial morphotypes cultured from cystic fibrosis (CF) sputum has questionable clinical relevance. Direct sputum sensitivity testing (DSST) is a whole-sputum susceptibility test that removes bias associated with selecting individual colonial morphotypes. We sought to determine whether, in principle, the results from DSST support the possibility of improved clinical relevance compared with C+S. Individual (DSSTi) and combination (DSST) susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, ceftazidime and meropenem were determined on 130 sputum samples referred from CF subjects with antibiotic-resistant chronic Gram-negative endobronchial infection. DSSTi and concurrent C+S were compared for categorical susceptibility, synergistic combinations were evaluated and the combination DSST efficacy index (DEI) calculated. Meropenem and tobramycin were the most active individual antibiotics by DSSTi on 89 P. aeruginosa-predominant samples, with 62 % of samples sensitive to each. C+S and DSSTi showed poor agreement (κ ranging from 0.02 to 0.6), discordance ranging from 20 % (meropenem) to 49 % (tobramycin), with DSSTi demonstrating both increased susceptibility and increased resistance. The combination that most frequently had the highest DEI was tobramycin + meropenem, occurring in 76 % of samples. DSSTi appears to be reproducible, yields different antimicrobial susceptibility results from C+S without simply identifying the most resistant isolates and DSST identifies the most effective in vitro antibiotic combinations, providing preliminary proof of concept of the potentially improved clinical relevance of whole-sputum testing. Future studies will determine whether these potential theoretical advantages translate into clinical benefits.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCystic FibrosisGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSputumAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID22790537
OpenAlexW1998606533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.